Flush mounted thru hull

This is the place to post your ideas, thoughts, questions and comments as relates to general boatbuilding and reconstruction techniques and procedures (i.e. recoring, epoxy, fiberglass, wood, etc.)
Post Reply
FloatingMoneyPit
Topside Painter
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:27 pm

Flush mounted thru hull

Post by FloatingMoneyPit »

I may have to replace some flush mounted thru hulls with larger thru hulls that have a larger flange. How do boatbuilders create the flanged-shaped cavity in the hull? Is there a specialized grinding bit for this?
Figment
Damned Because It's All Connected
Posts: 2846
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 9:32 am
Boat Name: Triton
Boat Type: Grand Banks 42
Location: L.I. Sound

Post by Figment »

1st of all.... don't fear the mushroom.

But if you have your heart set on flushmounts...

I've only done it once, and I kinda made it up as I went along. There probably is a better method. I over-ground the hollow after drilling the hole for the fitting, then coated the fitting with wax, slathered a huge gob of thickened epoxy into the hollow, and smooshed the fitting into place. After the epoxy had cured, I popped the fitting out and faired the squeezed-out epoxy, then reinstalled the fitting in a bed of sealant.

Because you're enlarging the fitting, make sure you have a big enough backing plate. I feel that because flushmount fittings eat away so much more of the skin of the boat, a much larger backing plate is prudent.
FloatingMoneyPit
Topside Painter
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:27 pm

Ah, duh!

Post by FloatingMoneyPit »

Now why didn't I think of that? Thank you for that, sir.
This is for the head intake thru hull, and all the other thru-hulls are flush, so I don't want it to feel left out if nothing else.
Definitely going with beefy backing plates for all thru hulls. 3/4" marine ply bedded in epoxy/silica, with seacock fastening bolts counterbored into the underside of the plate (no screw holes in the hull).
JonnyBoats
Candidate for Boat-Obsession Medal
Posts: 372
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 4:54 pm
Location: Wiscasset, ME
Contact:

Post by JonnyBoats »

with seacock fastening bolts counterbored into the underside of the plate (no screw holes in the hull).
I have seen people do this both ways, with screws through both the hull and backing plate and alternatively through only the backing plate.

What are the pros/cons of each method?
John Tarbox
S/V Altair, a LeComte NorthEast 38
http://www.boatmaine.us
User avatar
Tim
Shipwright Extraordinaire
Posts: 5708
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 6:39 pm
Boat Name: Glissando
Boat Type: Pearson Triton
Location: Whitefield, ME
Contact:

Post by Tim »

It's ultimately stronger if the bolts extend through backing plate and hull alike, but of course that's three or four extra holes in the hull to (in theory) worry about. The point of the fasteners securing the seacock is to ensure that the seacock cannot move, particularly if the valve freezes and excessive force is required to move the handle (or to try to move it).

Screwing into the backing plate only requires that the backing plate be bonded to the hull with epoxy or 5200, of course; otherwise, there would be no benefit at all. I think this method is OK when all is said and done, but is somewhat less strong in the end.

That said, I bolt through the hull, myself, and bond/seal it all with 5200 (including the backing plate to the hull).
---------------------------------------------------
Forum Founder--No Longer Participating
Post Reply